The latest move by Germany to tighten its migration policies on all land borders, a decision touted as a measure to prevent the inadvertent spread of COVID-19, has sparked a wave of anger among its European neighbours. Germany’s unilateral decision is viewed by many EU member states as highly suggestive of a shift in the country’s attitude towards the EU’s fundamental ideology of open borders, prompting a challenging debate about the future of border control within the bloc.
Germany, known for its vital central position in Europe, is the European Union’s biggest economy and has land borders with nine other countries. Its borders are at the core of the German identity and have traditionally symbolised European unity and the free movement of people, goods, and services within the EU. For many years, Germany has been recognised as a cornerstone of the Schengen Agreement, the treaty that abolished internal borders within the EU.
Nonetheless, this newly enforced migration control has seen checkpoints being re-established, disrupting the otherwise free movement. This has dramatically altered everyday life in cross-border regions and for many people who live and work on either side of the border. In these border towns, roads that were previously an unrestricted passage now face strict inspections, raising major issues concerning the freedom of movement.
The new regulations have also led to humanitarian concerns, particularly for refugees and asylum seekers. The tightening of border control measures has fuelled concerns over Germany’s commitment to EU laws regarding the treatment of migrants. Traditionally, Germany has been a welcoming country, accommodating a large number of asylum seekers. However, this recent shift raises questions about its stance on the refugee crisis.
Criticisms from the neighbouring countries show their disapproval over Germany’s policy, as it disrupts the integration efforts within the EU. France, Poland, and Denmark, among others, voiced their disappointment over the sudden decision. They referred to it as a backward step in the EU’s commitment towards border-free travel introduced by the Schengen Agreement. France, in particular, critically reminded Germany of the importance of ‘European solidarity’ in crisis management.
The German authorities, on the other hand, defended their decision by highlighting the country’s vulnerability to the virus. They stress that this is a temporary measure essential for maintaining public health and safety. They also pointed out that the move does not suggest a permanent diversion from Germany’s commitment to the Schengen Agreement.
Despite this, the decision’s wider implications are sparking concerns about a potential resurgence of nationalism and fragmentation within the European Union, amidst increasing far-right sentiments and immigration scepticism.
Without a doubt, the abrupt shift in Germany’s migration policy has upended life in border towns, distorted cross-border commerce, and potentially undermined long-standing EU principles. With the European neighbours expressing their anger about the unilateral decision, an open debate about the Schengen Agreement’s future and the mutual understanding of European solidarity becomes even more crucial.
